<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCTV doesn&#8217;t work - let&#8217;s fix it!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardskingdom.net/cctv-doesnt-work-lets-fix-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardskingdom.net/cctv-doesnt-work-lets-fix-it</link>
	<description>Privacy, security and politics in the digital world</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Davis wants to fix CCTV too &#60; Richard&#8217;s Kingdom</title>
		<link>http://www.richardskingdom.net/cctv-doesnt-work-lets-fix-it#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>David Davis wants to fix CCTV too &#60; Richard&#8217;s Kingdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardskingdom.net/?p=58#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] 10m posts look down on nothing but the tops of heads (and blouses, apparently). However, as I have previously noted, calling for better CCTV doesn&#8217;t imply support for more CCTV. This is where I too part [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10m posts look down on nothing but the tops of heads (and blouses, apparently). However, as I have previously noted, calling for better CCTV doesn&#8217;t imply support for more CCTV. This is where I too part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
